Another, often-overlooked factor: many Russian emigrants, especially those who went to the Balkans or other European countries, from Spain to the Czech Republic, have discovered a European type of social life that they do not want to abandon.
Emigrants often point out that Europeans are friendlier and more willing to help, while the pace of life in Europe is slower, meaning more time for people to focus on themselves. In addition, Russians appreciate the healthy relationships between people, safety and absence of crime and corruption at the everyday level. Even those who missed the glamour and dynamic cultural life of Moscow and St Petersburg in the first year after moving abroad, now acknowledge that Serbia, Montenegro and many other countries host concerts of artists who no longer perform in Russia, as many prominent cultural figures have emigrated, as well.
Emigrants have created a compelling social environment, opening cultural centers and libraries where meetings with famous Russian emigrant writers take place, as well as cafes with the usual Russian-European or Asian cuisine; holding tournaments with favorite Russian board games; and staging quests and stand-up shows.
Serbia-specific reasons for Russian emigrants to stay include Serbs’ historical fondness of Russians, the similarity of the Russian and Serbian languages, a milder climate (you often here “it was worth moving here just for the climate”) and cherishment of children. Meanwhile, some emigrants like the more patriarchal relations between people in Serbia compared to Western Europe, along with Orthodoxy and the low numbers of migrants from Arab and African countries.
Serbia’s advantages as an immigrant-friendly countryWill emigrants change their mind if the regime in Russia becomes more democratic and/or the postwar economy improves? In this case, the choice of the majority is less obvious and looks set to depend to a greater extent on how successfully individual emigrants will have adapted to their new home and how attractive the rewards for returning will be.
Hence the conclusion: it makes sense for any Russian government not to push away emigrants – as the
speaker of the Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin, and
others are doing now – but to try to persuade them to come back, at least temporarily (through fixed-term work contracts, invitations for skilled workers, etc.). An important step would be
to stop the persecution of scientists and scholars.
In the coming decade, the trend of mass migration is likely to continue across the globe, mostly from third-world countries and countries with unstable political systems and/or weak economies, regardless of whether politicians want it or not. The winners will be countries that can attract the most promising immigrants while mitigating the negative consequences of immigration.
One of Serbia’s advantages in this regard is the simplified procedure for issuing residence permits: currently, temporary ones are issued for three years and, if residency is needed for work or to open a company, can be obtained online even before entering the country. After that, permanent residency and then citizenship can be applied for.