A ‘color revolution’ in IranMoscow has openly supported the authorities in Tehran. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova
described the protests as “outside inspired unrest” and compared them to “color revolutions,” blaming them on “illegal Western sanctions pressure.” Zakharova focused on reports of possible US interference in Iran, condemning both potential US strikes and threats to impose higher tariffs on Iran’s foreign partners. (Trump has
announced that countries trading with Iran could face a 25% US tariff.)
“The marches with many thousands of Iranians in support of the sovereignty of the Islamic Republic are a guarantee of the failure of the sinister plans of those who cannot make peace with the very existence on the international stage of states capable of pursuing an independent foreign policy course and choosing their own friends,” Zakharova said.
Russia has also sought to present itself as a mediator. Putin
held telephone conversations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, which the Kremlin described as an attempt to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East. Putin himself has made no public statements regarding the situation in Iran.
The
Washington Post had previously
reported that Israel and Iran, with Russia acting as an intermediary, had privately exchanged mutual guarantees against attacks. According to the newspaper, in late December – before the mass protests began – Israel signaled through Moscow that it would refrain from striking Iran unless it were attacked first. Tehran reportedly made a reciprocal commitment not to undertake preemptive military action.
Russian state media have covered the protests in Iran in a manner broadly consistent with the Foreign Ministry’s line. The state news agency TASS has largely avoided reporting casualties among protesters, instead emphasizing – citing the Iranian authorities – that the actions of “
pogromists” had resulted in the deaths of law enforcement officers and civilians.
Rossiyskaya Gazeta similarly
cites official Iranian statements and claims that the law enforcement agencies have the situation under control.
Russian television has used
even harsher language. For example, a report on Russia-1 claimed that it was not law enforcement officers who opened fire on protesters but rather “armed terrorists.” Analysts on Russia’s Channel One linked the protests to hostile actions by external forces, primarily the US and Israel.
Russia’s support has its limitsMiddle East analyst Nikita Smagin, who frequently comments on events in Iran for Russian media outlets operating from abroad,
notes that the Russian leadership views events in Iran negatively for at least two reasons: first, Moscow has managed to set up cooperation with Iran’s current political leadership amid sanctions and heightened international isolation since 2022; second, the Kremlin is generally hostile to attempts to overthrow authoritarian governments, fearing that the same thing could happen in Russia.
Smagin notes that Moscow is providing Tehran with limited military assistance. During the protests, reports
emerged that Russian Mi-28 helicopters and Il-76 military transport aircraft – deliveries announced for 2023 – had arrived in Iran, along with Spartak armored vehicles. According to Smagin, this equipment could prove useful if the protests were to escalate into a full-scale armed uprising.
At the same time, Smagin argues that Moscow is unlikely to take decisive measures: “Russia, of course, will not try to save the Islamic Republic if that comes at the cost of its own resources, risking [Russian] soldiers, military personnel or anything else,” he says.
“As in Syria, if the situation truly deteriorates, Russia will likely step aside. But as long as [the regime] is not wobbling, or wobbling only a bit, Russia is prepared to help with weapons and perhaps some advice. That said, the possibility that Khamenei could suddenly flee the country and find refuge in Moscow should not be ruled out. That is entirely possible.”