“The Russian world is more than a thousand years of history, great culture, rich language, unique traditions and customs,” begins
one video on the
Russkiy mir concept. According to the narrator, the “Russian world” is not delineated by contemporary Russia’s borders. Following the Soviet collapse, millions of Russians involuntarily became citizens of other states, where they have since been victims of discrimination and persecution. State-sponsored Russophobia is said to be rampant in Western Europe as well. Russia, however, is committed to defending compatriots everywhere and preserving Russian culture globally.
What The DNA of Russia has to say about Ukraine This video then highlights the alleged discrimination of Russians in Ukraine. These processes, the narrative goes, intensified after the Euromaidan, described as an illegal seizure of power by Nazis with Western backing. In response, Crimeans decided to rejoin Russia in 2014.
The Russophobe activities of the new Ukrainian government soon sparked mass resistance, leading to civil war in the Donbas. For eight years, Russia did everything possible to resolve the conflict peacefully, but come 2022 it had no choice but to launch a “special military operation” to protect the people who had been subjected to harassment and genocide by the Kyiv regime and defend the “Russian world.”
The
video on the civilization state presents Russia as the “guardian of the global balance,” endowed with a special historical role. The narrative draws heavily on
Lev Gumilev’s work, especially his concept of “passionarity.” “Each ethnic group has a unique system of values and aspirations incomprehensible to others,” the narrator says, the world “heterogeneous and divided into many civilizations.”
Seven such civilizations are presented: Western, Orthodox, Far Eastern, Hindu, Arab, Iranian and Chinese – a somewhat abridged version of
Huntington’s list of major civilizations. It is argued that the West has always been hostile to Russia, with European culture reproducing “Russophobic” stereotypes. Lastly, it is suggested that the Russian civilization state should not imitate other countries’ political systems. “Russia is... an integrational empire... [that] has the ability to develop and improve incorporated territories.”
The
video on cancel culture defines this phenomenon as a “form of boycott when an objectionable (
neugodnyy) person, social movement or state... are censured for their actions or statements.” Among the historical precedents of contemporary cancel culture are said to be the book burnings in Nazi Germany. The West, the voice-over explains, has attempted for centuries to weaken and destroy Russia, employing tactics such as diplomatic isolation and the falsification of history. Contemporary cancel culture is a continuation of this process by other means.
The cited examples include
canceling concerts by the conductor Valery Gergiev and
banning Russian teams from participating in the Olympic Games, along with many other instances concerning Russian culture, literature, language and sports. However, the video concludes, it is impossible to “cancel” Russia. Despite the machinations of Western politicians, ordinary people will continue to appreciate the works of Pushkin, Tchaikovsky and Dostoevsky.
Overall,
The DNA of Russia presents the core themes of ideological education in today’s Russia, such as World War II as the central event in Russian history, a plethora of grievances against the West and the emphasis on Russia’s role as the defender of Russians abroad, especially in the former Soviet republics.