The more drones, the more we eatIn its weekly surveys, FOM (Public Opinion Foundation) asks respondents to name, without prompting, the events of the past week that stood out to them. Recently, a new trend has emerged.
In the latest
survey, most respondents (57%) either could not or would not name any memorable events. But among the 43% who could or would, the top responses, mentioned by 20%, were effective propaganda tropes about Russian victories: “we are following the special military operation,” “our soldiers are liberating our lands – it’s a shame they are dying,” “the situation on the special military operation and our boys on the front line – they are doing a great job,” “our boys are advancing and liberating territory.”
But in second place, cited by 9% of respondents (or nearly one in four of those who recalled something), were mentions of the war encroaching deeper into Russian territory: “drones flying in Tatarstan,” “bombings on our territory,” “UAVs in the Leningrad Region,” “explosions in Kazan and Kursk,” “drones in Udmurtia,” “drones flew to Engels and Voronezh,” “the number of drones penetrating our territory.”
Other responses included frustration with Trump (4%) – “he changed his attitude toward Russia,” “he is supplying Ukraine with weapons” – and disruptions in communications infrastructure (1%) – “the internet was shut off because of drones.”
Though most Russians remain personally untouched by the war, they are clearly experiencing psychological strain. One of the ways they are coping is by
eating more. In May, food service sector sales were 11.4% higher in real terms than a year earlier.
Ordinary Russians’ superpower-sized appetitesAfter all these observations, let’s return to the Russian Field survey that we began with and ask: what sort of end to the war do these not so unperturbed people imagine? Are they, perhaps, becoming more open to compromise?
Russia Field has posed this question in various ways over time, changing the wording and sometimes even asking respondents to come up the terms of a peace settlement themselves. The results have been consistent.
For example, respondents were asked to select the terms they deemed necessary for a peace agreement with Ukraine. Recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics as Russian territory was selected by 78% (versus 16%). The transfer by Kyiv of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, even the parts that Russia does not control today, was deemed necessary by 67% (versus 24%). Meanwhile, 73% demanded that Ukraine abandon its NATO aspirations (versus 19%), while 50% wanted to annex even more territory beyond what has already been seized (versus 40%).
And these are not the only demands made by Russia’s peace-loving citizens. The rest, like reductions in Ukraine’s military and new elections, carry the same imperial tone.
Support for the idea of coexistence with a sovereign Ukraine as it was before the war remains as marginal as ever: just 11% support a return to the 1991 borders (78% opposed) and only 18% favor giving back any Ukrainian territory (72% opposed).
The public’s growing weariness with the war is not translating into greater willingness to compromise. The only thing rising is the desire to stop the bloodshed.
According to ExtremeScan
polling, a sizable share of Russians last autumn were willing to accept “mutual concessions” as a way to end the war. But Trump’s election, coinciding with the start of Russia’s latest offensive, made them think that perhaps no concessions would be necessary.
At the start of 2025, Russian Field found that the public expected the war to end not only victoriously but also in the near term. That hope for a swift, victorious conclusion, against the backdrop of Trump’s election, has
fizzled. But the pre-Trump soberness has not fully returned either.
The peace-loving average Russian sees how Putin’s army is pushing deeper into Ukraine and is ready to wait. Especially since he does not have to go fight.